|
|
|
Peter Armistead takes 3rd place in Whistler 50!
|
You may recognize this photo from the cover a recent edition of the Whistler Question. Yes Peter caused quite a stir with his incredible podium worthy performance in his first ever ultra marathon...and rightly so! |
I helped
Peter prepare for this 50 Mile race and got to know him pretty well
during our many hours spent out on the trails. I have to say that I'm impressed but not surprised by Peter's third place finish. In
an effort to help you get to know the man behind the performance a
little better, here's my attempt at being a sports journalist;
Peter, what do you enjoy about running?
"I've
been a recreational runner for many years but it was only since
starting trail running last year that my interest has really spiked.
For me the combination of being in the mountains, seeing and smelling
nature and breathing in the fresh air totally invigorates me. Add to
that an amazing work out and trail running really takes top spot as my
favorite summer sport. It really takes me back to basics. There's
nothing more basic than a person and a pair of running shoes going up
and down a few mountains using his body."
What do like about racing?
"Racing really takes running to another level. You obviously need to
have all the right preparation and training but when it comes to a race
nothing can provide you with that 10-20% extra that you always manage to
find. In a race I am constantly borderline out of control. I'm pushing
my heart, muscles and nutritional preparations in ways that I would
never have planned for. As Mike Tyson once said "everyone has a plan, until they get hit in the face". Its the same in running. You never know what you're capable of until you're in the unknown."
Finally, how does running contribute to your overall training program and health?
"I left my
life as a corporate lawyer in London to become a skier and improve my
fitness levels. I spent several years getting fitter and stronger, but
it wasn't until I started running with focus that I really improved my
fitness levels. Last year I increased my running from doing 3 runs of
about 40 mins each a week on the Valley Trail, to trail running up to a
couple of hours 5 times a week. I signed up with Chris as I was at a
plateau and I didn't think it was possible for me as a 41 year old to
make any more improvements by myself. I was basically going out and
doing the same type of runs (hard and fast for as long as I could) and
getting the same results (which weren't bad admittedly!). It was
certainly better than not going out and running!! However with Chris's
expert knowledge and instruction, the last 5 months have been absolutely
life changing for me and my fitness levels."
Way to go Peter! What a day!
2013 Helly Hansen Trail Training Tuesdays - Schedule
$100 HOME GYM
These days I workout at home 1-2
times each week. Just like it is great to train in a well equipped
facility, the same can be said for the convenience of not having to
travel to the gym.
Life Get's in the Way
How
many training sessions have you missed because you couldn't find time
to get to the gym in the last 6-months? 10%? Maybe 25%? Maybe you gave
up all together? That is the other huge benefit of the home gym. It eliminates your ability to make excuses.
Budget: $100
These
days $100 doesn't buy you much. Heck, my cell phone bill is usually over
$100 and that is about the going rate for a good pair of training
shoes. With that being said, let's make sure we spend it wisely.
1) Dumbbells - $40:
A good chunk of your $100 should be spent on weight. Since it's
resistance training we're doing, we're gonna need some resistance. While
I personally prefer kettlebells because I think they're a bit more
versatile than dumbbells,
they're also usually more than twice as expensive as dumbbells. The
specific weights that will be best for you will depend on your training
history. I recommend 1 heavier dumbbell and 1 lighter to start, around
10-15 pounds apart. Dumbbells generally run about $1/pound so a 15 and a
25 would cost around $40.
2) Step - $15: maybe you already have one of these lying
around the house, but I bet you've never looked at it and thought "man,
I bet that step could get me legs super strong!". I use this step
(shown in picture to the right) with a home based client and it's great
for a tonne of great exercises - single leg squats, rear foot elevated
split squats, step-ups, single leg bridge, barbell bridge, bench for
single arm dumbbell chest press, etc. Just make sure it's strong and
sturdy! This step can be found at Home Depot is rated for 300 pounds.
3) Skipping Rope - $15:
no surprises here. The skipping rope has been around for a long time
and for good reason. Very little space is required and you can get a
high quality aerobic workout.
4) Ab Wheel - $15-20:
The ab wheel is one of those pieces of equipment that's an old school
classic. It is an inexpensive and seemingly innocuous device that
presents quite a challenge.
There are a number of ways to increase and decrease the challenge with
this device, but what I like most about it is that it teaches how to
maintain a strong midsection while moving the limbs. I wouldn't consider
the ab wheel to be a home gym essential, but for $20 it's a sound
investment in a stronger midsection.
5) Tennis/Lacrosse Balls - $5-10: excellent tools for performing self-massage to help maintain good tissue quality.
So
there you have it, some simple tools that you can get a tonne of mileage
out of when paired with the right program. With the right knowledge and
instruction (hint, hint) a huge variety of exercises to challenge all abilities is possible.
Having
the option to perform a workout at home from time to time will go a long
way in helping you stay on track. As I've said many, many times "the
best exercise program is the one that you actually do!".
Exercise for Fat Loss
Exercise and fitness
programs have long been marketed as weight loss and "body transformation"
programs. Many fitness professionals and slick marketing salesmen who sell
exercise books, machines, DVD's, etc. have INCORRECTLY shaped the public's
expectations about what exercise can and cannot do for them. The problem is,
exercise by itself is an extremely ineffective weight loss method. The public
then buys into this, have high expectations, and then are very disappointed in
their results. With this in mind, let’s take a closer look at the
realistic contribution of exercise to the fat loss picture.
Cardiovascular
Activities, on average, burn about 10 calories per minute. A beginner
with a very low level of fitness and poor work capacity will burn less. A
trained individual can withstand intensities which will burn more (up to 20
calories/minute). But, let's call it 10 calories per minute on average.
Weight training burns roughly 7-9 calories per minute. I should note that there
is huge variability here. The type of exercise you are performing (multiple
joint vs. single joint), the loads you are using (heavy weight vs. light weight),
the overall volume of the workout, your momentary effort level on each
exercise, etc. all will influence how many calories are burned. Also, keep in
mind that strength training workouts are basically interval workouts: you do a
set, rest a minute or so, do another set, etc. So, while you may be in the gym
for an hour when you strength train, probably only 30-40 minutes of that is
actual metabolic work.
Ok, so let's say you were to exercise 7 days/week for an hour: 3 strength
workouts (perhaps Mon/Wed/Fri) and 4 cardio type workouts (Tues/Thurs/Sat/Sun).
Let's assume the strength workouts, on average, burn 7 calories/minute and you
are performing actual work for 40 of those 60 minutes (this is generous). Let's
also assume you are doing 60 minutes of continuous calorie burning work at an
average of 10 calories/minute on cardio days. Again, this is generous. So...
- 3 strength training workouts: 120 minutes of work @ 7
calories/minute=840 total calories burned
- 4 cardio workouts: 240 minutes of work @ 10 calories/minute=2400
total calories burned
Grand Total for the Week: 3240 calories.
The reality
is it's not all that much. 3240 calories is less than 1 pound of fat (3500
calories roughly).
This is why people who don't change their eating habits (which doesn't require
any actual time I might add...beyond planning) and try to "exercise
off" body fat fail miserably, become discouraged, and say "screw
it".
Think about it this way: It can take up to 6 hours-based on the
calculations above-to burn 3240 calories. How long does it take to eat an extra
3240 calories each week? How long does it take NOT to eat 3240 calories each
week?
I should
also mention that the majority of information regarding EPOC, the "after
burn" is drastically over stated and misinterpreted. If you look at the
research on post workout calorie burn and metabolic rate elevation, it's not
significant enough to even be considered. I'll be generous and give you an
extra 10% (based on what most research has shown).
So, someone hitting the gym EVERY day for an hour, after a
month's time, assuming they are not ingesting more calories than they are
expending, may lose 3 or 4 pounds. This is isn't exactly motivating for the end
user, especially when the experts have made exercise out to be a great stand
alone weight loss method. What typically happens is the well meaning exerciser
who has been making a huge time commitment will say "screw it" and
abandon exercise all together because they think they are not getting anything
out of it. I mean, who can blame them when guys like me have been telling them
otherwise?
Back Troubles in the Long Distance Runner by Stuart McGill
|
Smart guy with an epic 'stache. |
I'm not a betting man, but I'd put money down that you've heard of
Dr. Stuart McGill. Whether you're a professional athlete or someone who
just wants a stronger core, you probably know of him. And if by some
chance you haven't heard his name, I guarantee that many of the core
exercises you're currently doing have been influenced by him.
In 2002, McGill released his landmark text Low Back Disorders: Evidence-Based Prevention and Rehabilitation
and it changed the way coaches, bodybuilders, athletes, and
non-athletes approach core training. With his books, articles,
seminars, and more than 30 years of clinical research with everyone from
elite athletes to disabled workers, Dr. McGill established himself
as the premier voice for core development.
In the passage below, McGill discusses some of the reasons why runners may have back issues. This passage can be found in his excellent book Ultimate Back Fitness & Performance;
"Efficiency in long distance running depends on a stiff torso. Suggesting that runners "image" not having a joint between their shoulders and hips is a start. Training the weak link of the torso stiffness and stability in their overall program is easily addressed. Another common practice among this group is an overemphasis on flexion (forward bending) stretches. Runners tend to overstretch the hamstrings at the hip, the spine and shoulders in flexion. Many have developed accentuated kyphosis (slouched or "hunchback" posture). Interestingly, I would not suggest stretching beyond the range of motion needed for running. The great runners, to a large extent, run on their passive tissues (natural "spring-y-ness" of muscles and tendons - think kangaroos). Some would do better with less stretching! I generally only suggest stretching to correct asymmetries (differences between sides). Here is why is take this approach. When I am asked to see the cross-country or long distance track athlete with back pain, I look for movement asymmetry in the torso. For example, upon right foot heel strike there may be torsional motion in the lumbar (low back) region. There could be several causes for this. Further screening is conducted to sort out the cause, which is then addressed. However, more core stiffness mostly always helps. Challenged breathing while performing torso stability work ensures the ventilation system and diaphragm function are not compromised with abdominal muscles contraction. The full side bridge (see photo) during heavy breathing is an excellent start on this approach. Generally, the trick is to remove the cause of the back trouble in these special types of athletes, rather than create a new set of general training exercise."
|
Side Bridge. Required eguipment: floor. |
Helpful words from the Back Master. Let me know if you have any questions about the information presented here or would like to learn more.
Milo and Progressive Overload
Milo was a wrestler. Not just any
wrestler, but possibly the greatest wrestler of all time. He won and
unmatched 5 Olympic titles. For 5 consecutive Olympic Games Milo was
undefeated in the sport of wrestling. He competed in a sixth Olympic
Games and then still came in second. By the time of his sixth Olympiad
he was well into his forties. Even then he was never equaled in strength
and only lost to a much younger opponent who avoided Milo for most of
the match.
In addition to his wrestling prowess, Milo possessed
unmatched strength. The wrestler could stand with his right arm at his
side, elbow bent at 90 degrees, thumb pointing straight up in the air
with fingers spread and keep any who tried from bending so much as his
little finger. Continuously demonstrating his almost super-human
strength, Milo proved he was the strongest man on Earth.
What was the secret to Milo’s great strength? Progressive
Overload. You see, Milo was a cattle farmer. One of his cows was born
lame. The otherwise healthy cow could not walk. Milo had to carry the
young calf to pasture in the morning and again carry the calf to his pen
in the evening. As the calf grew heavier, Milo grew stronger. Over
the course of time the calf became a full-grown bull. Milo’s strength
grew accordingly. After a while, Milo was lifting and carrying an adult
bull around the barnyard several times a day.
When the calf was first born Milo could easily carry him.
Things changed when the calf began to gain weight. As the young calf
gained weight, he became an overload on Milo’s muscles. Milo adapted to
this load and became stronger. As the calf continued to grow and Milo
continued to gain strength.
When we train with weights, our goal should be to
progressively overload the muscular system so it can adapt and get
stronger. This means that every time we train we should try to increase
either the amount of weight we use (like Milo’s calf gaining weight) or
increase the number of reps we perform (like Milo carrying the calf
around the barnyard and not just a direct trip to the pasture). Other
methods of overload can be to train at a faster pace, spending less rest
time between sets or increase the speed at which we move a given
weight.
|
|